Back to PRGS
BL
Bhushan Lodha
5/13/20260 comments

PRGS organic vs inorganic revenue last 5 years

When looking at Progress Software (PRGS), it is essential to look right past the headline growth numbers. Management executes a very specific capital allocation playbook they call the "Total Growth Strategy."

Progress does not perpetually break out dollar-for-dollar organic vs. inorganic revenue in their 10-K GAAP line items. Instead, they report total revenue and use pro-forma Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR) on a constant currency basis as their proxy for organic growth.

Here is the forensic breakdown of their revenue growth over the last five fiscal years (FY ends Nov 30), isolating the organic baseline from their M&A engine.

PRGS Revenue Growth Breakdown (FY21 – FY25)

Fiscal YearTotal RevenueYoY Total GrowthEst. Organic ContributionEst. Inorganic ContributionPrimary M&A Driver
FY 2021$557M+22%~2% - 3%~19%Chef Software
FY 2022$610M+10%~2% - 3%~7%Kemp Technologies
FY 2023$698M+14%~3%~11%MarkLogic
FY 2024$753M+8%~1% - 2%~6%—
FY 2025~$960M*+27%~1% - 2%~25%ShareFile

*FY 2025 figures represent management's final guided range / actuals following the massive ShareFile integration.


Forensic Takeaways

  • The Organic Engine is Structurally Flat: Progress Software's organic growth is remarkably consistent, but very low—historically hovering between 1% and 3% year-over-year. They operate mature, extremely sticky enterprise software products (like OpenEdge). Their Net Retention Rate (NRR) consistently hovers right around 99% to 101%, meaning the core business doesn't leak revenue, but it doesn't organically expand rapidly either.
  • The Inorganic Engine Drives the Top Line: The vast majority of double-digit top-line expansion comes entirely from acquisitions. The management scorecard here is focused entirely on buying mature B2B software assets with loyal customer bases, aggressively stripping out excess overhead, and plugging them into the PRGS operational machine.
  • Margin Expansion over Revenue Acceleration: If you track management's priorities, they do not attempt to force 10% organic growth out of legacy products. Instead, they use that stable 1-3% organic baseline to protect the bottom line, consistently driving non-GAAP operating margins upward (often hitting 39% to 41% in recent quarters) while using the generated free cash flow to fund the next acquisition or pay down the associated debt.

If you are modeling PRGS moving forward, the baseline expectation should remain exactly the same: 1% to 3% organic ARR growth, with periodic 10% to 20%+ inorganic spikes whenever a major acquisition (like ShareFile or MarkLogic) hits the books.

Source: PRGS Organic vs. Inorganic Revenue

Comments

No comments yet. Readers can leave comments directly from the expanded post on the board page.